![]() ![]() “Whitehead’s Idea of God.” In The Philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead, edited by P.A. “Evil and Persuasive Power.” Process Studies 2/1 (1972): 44-48.ġ0.5840/process1972214 Search in Google Scholar “Creation «Ex Nihilo», The Divine «Modus Operandi», and the «Imitatio Dei».” In Faith and Creativity, edited by G. “Creation out of Chaos and the Problem of Evil.” In Encountering Evil: Live Options in Theodicy, edited by Providence and Evil, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977. ![]() “Contrasting Conceptions of Creation.” Review of Metaphysics 45/1 (1991): 89-109.įrankenberry, Nancy. New York: Paulist Press, 1976, 79-92.įord, Lewis S. “The Power of God and the Christ.” In Religious Experience and Process Theology, edited by H.J. Indianapolis, Indiana: Bobbs-Merrill, 1971, 287-304 (1st publ. “Divine Persuasion and the Triumph of Good.” In Process Philosophy and Christian Thought, edited byĭ. The Logic of Self-Involvement: A Philosophical Study of Everyday Language with Special Reference to the Christian Use of Language about God as Creator. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1942.Įvans, Donald D. The Religious Availability of Whitehead’s God: A Critical Analysis. Encountering Evil: Live Options in Theodicy, Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1981.Įly, Stephen L. ![]() ” In Encountering Evil: Live Options in Theodicy, edited by S.T. “How Does God Act in our Time? An Invitation to a Dialogue between Process and Liberation Theologies.” Union Seminary Quartely Review 32 (1976-1977): 25-35.ĭavis, Stephen T. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1969.Ĭooper, Burton Z. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1965.Ĭobb, Jr., John B. A Christian Natural Theology: Based on the Thought of Alfred North Whitehead. “The ratio omnipotentiae in Aquinas.” Acta Philosophica 2/1 (1993): 17-42.Ĭobb, Jr., John B. Almighty God: A Study of the Doctrine of Divine Omnipotence. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1988.īrink, Gijsbert van den. Divine Power in Process Theism: A Philosophical Critique. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Book House, 1987, 197-213.īasinger, David. “Divine Power: Do Process Theists Have a Better Idea?” In Process Theology, edited by R. “Human Coercion: A Fly in the Process Ointment?” Process Studies 15/3 (1986): 161-171.ġ0.5840/process198615343 Search in Google Scholarīasinger, David. Freddoso () The Summa Theologica, translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province (Benziger Bross, edition 1947) and Summa Theologiae: Latin text and English translation, edited by Blackfriars, London/New York, 1967-1975.īasinger, David. Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae (Summa Theologica), by Alfred J. Translations I have used: New English Translation of St. “What is Authority?” In Hannah Arendt, Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. Pantokrator (and thus markedly differs from Hans Jonas’ concept).Īrendt, Hannah. How despite Whitehead’s rejection of God’s omnipotence, his concept retains essential elements of God as Will allow for a reinterpretation of divine almightiness from a Whiteheadian perspective, which will show Finally, a discussion of the issue of divine almightiness Whitehead’s conception, cannot possibly coerce. Theĭifference between coercion and persuasion will be explained as well as the reason why God, according to The World depend upon each other, and that God’s agency is a non-coercive but persuasive power. Of Whitehead’s idiosyncratic view on God’s agency will show that, according to this conception, God and This will be followed by a close examination of Whitehead’s own position, starting withĪn introduction to his philosophy of organism and its two-sided concept of God. The article starts with an exploration of Aquinas’ reasoning towards God’s That God’s persuasive power is required for everything to exist and to occur. Whitehead rejects divine omnipotence (unlike Aquinas), yet he claims (unlike Hans Jonas) Whitehead’s position regarding God’s power is rather unique in the philosophical and theological ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |